Saturday, August 20, 2011

Navigating Through a FINRA Claims by Brad Richdale


Arbitration can provide many benefits to investors if implemented correctly and with much planning. Weigh the advantages and disadvantages of taking your case to arbitration to decide whether it is best for your claim.








Section II – Chapter IV

The Greatest Corporate Screw Up of All Time!
How You Can Rip Your Employer’s Heart Out and Recover Retirement Account Losses

There once was an era where many corporations in America all had pension plans as part of their employees’ retirement packages. But by the 1980s and early 1990s, these pension plans were already overfunded and companies found that most of their assets lied within the hands of their employees.

As a result, the retirement plans started to fall through and companies had to enter the lion’s den of angry shareholders, global competition and trade deficits when the bottom line didn’t grow as fast as these large corporations expected it would. They could no longer keep up with the payments into the pension accounts and needed to make a change. To hold onto their employees and keep the idea of pension accounts alive to avoid going into bankruptcy, these companies needed to put the burden on their employees to save for their retirement accounts. As long as this transition was done under an ethical manner, these companies saw nothing wrong with this idea.

Today, these pension plans are now known as 401k, SEP and IRA accounts.
In 2006, Congress passed the Pension Protection Act (PPA), a piece of legislation that promoted the flexibility in retirement plan programs. The PPA worked along the lines of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to allow for employers to obtain fiduciary protection for investments without automatic enrollment plans. With this plan, Congress aimed to increase this plan among companies across the nation believing that these arrangements would encourage a high potential for boosting retirement readiness among workers in America.

The Department of Labor (DOL) finalized the rules on how fiduciary protection could still exist for amounts contributed to the retirement plan while no investment direction was received directly from the employees. Finally, a program was created with a number of requirements and strict guidelines put into place about how these accounts should be set up, including the use of a qualified default investment alternative (QDIA). In other words, the PPA created the QDIA concept to limit fiduciary liability for plan losses by establishing a safe harbor for selecting an investment for participants who fail to choose their own.
This new retirement plan allowed for the fiduciary to select a fund for amounts not directed by employees to other plan options and be relieved from any losses that might be a direct result from the investment.

Under the ERISA guidelines, a system of checks and balances had to take place, especially as it pertained to diligence and suitability. It was the responsibility of corporations to adhere to and follow these guidelines. Otherwise, it would mean outright negligence if they didn’t comply.

Big corporations came to the notion that they could save time and money by delegating this work out to the major mutual fund companies. They also believed that the mutual fund companies would not let them down and they would keep them in compliance under the guidelines of QDIA and the ERISA mandates.

The Department of Labor defines QDIA as an investment fund or model portfolio that is designed to provide long-term appreciation and capital preservation through a mix of equity and fixed income exposures. The DOL generally requires a QDIA to include a mix of stocks and bonds that 


                                                             written by Bradford Richdale


                                             copyright Brad Richdale TM 2010 all rights reserved