Saturday, August 20, 2011

Property Tax Reduction Part IN THE STATE OF TEXAS BY BRAD RICHDALE


can build an argument with similar properties as proof in a prepared presentation, you can informally argue the value will be very likely to agree if your evidence is conclusive.

If you want to hire a professional, hire an M.A.I. who is an appraiser that is of the most senior designation for qualifications. An assessor will tend to have respect for someone with professional credentials attending with you or preparing the case with you. I don’t suggest bringing an attorney to an informal meeting with an assessor because they want to dominate and assessors act more aggressively. I’ve witnessed it all over the country. 

But if you are an attorney, I suggest getting your M.A.I. or hiring a local M.A.I. and start the representation in property taxation. It’s a great model for legal income, especially on a contingency fee basis and price volatility will keep it that way.

I do think that knowing what the state’s laws are for property tax valuations is critically important to be successful in arguing for reduced value and for protecting your future. I expect that some states will change laws and start to focus on the cost and income approach to value to confuse the matter even more. I give this a 100 percent chance of happening; it’s just a matter of when. Mayors don’t like firing policemen and governors like building bridges, especially when they collapse.

Right now it costs way more to replace homes and buildings than what they are worth and incomes on rental real estate are plummeting. If states legislate to weigh equally with market, the cost and income approach to value property for taxation will be an even bigger mess and easier to win cases in my opinion (but even more confusing to folks that haven’t read this).  

Knowing my faith in government, I suspect there will be more new property tax legislation than ever before that will increase the confusion for the taxpayer and increase revenues.

Semi-formal hearings in some states happen annually and in all states happen during re-valuations. If you meet with your assessor during the designated period during a re-valuation and he says no to a lower value, then the next step is to go to the local Board of Equalization and Review. The title might not be exactly the same, but the board may be idiots or officials that really know their stuff. It’s great to see them at work before your hearing, which is open to the public.

For instance, if you are in Pooler, Georgia where Boss Hog lives, he may just deny you for no reason and his kangaroo court could see if you are willing to go the state board, it happens. Or you have a great case and the board says yes to your reduced value and you save $13,000. We may see a period where assessors are like insurance companies and will deny claims and make everyone either go to the next level or go away.

Here’s a rule of thumb, the larger the city and the more spending scheduled, the harder the fight. One nice thing about disputing property tax values is that governments are adroit at caring for themselves so the appeals and offices are usually in nice buildings.

The state level of appeal is an entirely different ball game and the case runs much like a formal court case. 

A great litigator who I knew years ago and I took on a lousy case that we both thought might hammer the county on behalf of resort developers and owners.


                                                          written by Brad Richdale
                                                       blog founded by Bradford Richdale